- Home
- News & Blogs
- About Us
- What We Do
- Our Communities
- Info Centre
- Press
- Contact
- Archive 2019
- 2015 Elections: 11 new BME MP’s make history
- 70th Anniversary of the Partition of India
- Black Church Manifesto Questionnaire
- Brett Bailey: Exhibit B
- Briefing Paper: Ethnic Minorities in Politics and Public Life
- Civil Rights Leader Ratna Lachman dies
- ELLE Magazine: Young, Gifted, and Black
- External Jobs
- FeaturedVideo
- FeaturedVideo
- FeaturedVideo
- Gary Younge Book Sale
- George Osborne's budget increases racial disadvantage
- Goldsmiths Students' Union External Trustee
- International Commissioners condemn the appalling murder of Tyre Nichols
- Iqbal Wahhab OBE empowers Togo prisoners
- Job Vacancy: Head of Campaigns and Communications
- Media and Public Relations Officer for Jean Lambert MEP (full-time)
- Number 10 statement - race disparity unit
- Pathway to Success 2022
- Please donate £10 or more
- Rashan Charles had no Illegal Drugs
- Serena Williams: Black women should demand equal pay
- Thank you for your donation
- The Colour of Power 2021
- The Power of Poetry
- The UK election voter registration countdown begins now
- Volunteering roles at Community Alliance Lewisham (CAL)
House of Lords reform: 'Times up, Me Lords'
The Coalition Government have set out in Today's Queen's Speech historic legislation to reform the House of Lords. This piece of legislation could be as controversial as the voting reform was last year which saw the Liberal Democrats hopelessly out maneuvered by their Coalition Conservative partners. This time, though, the Lib Dems will be better prepared for a political dog-fight about reforming the nation's political infrastructure.
Black and minority ethnic communities should broadly welcome reform of the House of Lords. But it's not always that straight forward. Often political parties use the Upper House to appoint BME individuals who otherwise would find it difficult to get a selection for a Parliamentary seat. Think of Conservative Party Chair Baroness Sayeeda Waris, high flying Labour peers, Baroness Amos, and Baroness Scotland, Lib Dem Peers, Baroness Meral Ece, Lord Dholakia, and Baroness Floella Benjamin. Party bosses circumvented a democratic system that impeded BME talent. Talented individuals rose through the ranks but political patronage reigned supreme. If Labour and the Lib Dems get their way more than 600 years of history will be swept away.
The House of Lords dates back to the 14th Century when our nation's governance was divided between the shire and borough representatives which became known as the Commons and the other of religious leaders (Lords Spiritual) and magnates (Lords Temporal) became known as the Upper House. The idea was that the religious Leaders and Magnates were either so powerful and or immensely rich, that they, unlike those in the Commons, they were least likely to be corruptible.
Therefore, the Upper House could be a 'check and balance' to legislation made by the Commons. But as the years rolled by the House of Lords has come to symbolise outdated privilege. The first attack on privilege was by the last Government who abolished the hereditary peers, now the Coalition, or least the Lib Dem side of the Coalition would like to see an 80% elected chamber.
Whether we will see it come to pass before we get to the next General Election, I wouldn't bet on it.
Simon Woolley
